<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Barrett&#039;s Musings &#187; Hyndburn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/category/hyndburn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk</link>
	<description>andrewbarrett.org.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Labour MP Greg Pope to Step Down at Next Election</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/2009/06/11/labour-mp-greg-pope-to-step-down-at-next-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/2009/06/11/labour-mp-greg-pope-to-step-down-at-next-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Barrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hyndburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Pope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Pope has represented the Hyndburn constituency for some 17 years. He has announced in the Accrington Observer that he will step down at the next election for &#8216;personal reasons&#8217; rather than his expenses that came to light last week. Mr Pope had a 5,587 majority over the Conservatives in the 2005 general election and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Pope has represented the Hyndburn constituency for some 17 years.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>He has announced in the Accrington Observer that he will step down at the next election for &#8216;personal reasons&#8217; rather than his expenses that came to light last week.</p>
<p>Mr Pope had a 5,587 majority over the Conservatives in the 2005 general election and the European election results for Hyndburn were as follows: Conservatives 6037 Labour 5020 UKIP 3906 BNP 2731 Lib 1285</p>
<p>Currently no Conservative prospective parliamentary candidate is in place.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pope21.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-222 aligncenter" title="pope21" src="http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pope21-300x225.jpg" alt="pope21" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/2009/06/11/labour-mp-greg-pope-to-step-down-at-next-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyndburn Council Tax; Most Expensive or Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/2008/05/04/hyndburn-council-tax-most-expensive-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/2008/05/04/hyndburn-council-tax-most-expensive-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Barrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hyndburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajcb.co.uk/2008/05/04/hyndburn-council-tax-most-expensive-or-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labour leaflets and Councillor Graham Jones have been banging the drum calling Hyndburn the &#8216;most expensive council in the country&#8217;. I delved into the claims, as I dislike unnecessary taxation. The main argument is based on a January 2007 article in the Telegraph that quotes Hyndburn council tax of being 8.1% of peoples income, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour leaflets and Councillor Graham Jones have been banging the drum calling Hyndburn the &#8216;most expensive council in the country&#8217;. I delved into the claims, as I dislike unnecessary taxation. The main argument is based on a January 2007 article in the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/main.jhtml?xml=/property/tables/stampduty/northwestC.xml" target="_blank">Telegraph</a> that quotes Hyndburn council tax of being 8.1% of peoples income, the highest in the list.</p>
<p>I looked into the figures and as you can see from the link, it is based on peoples average income (£17,842) and the Band D rate of council tax (£1,439). At first glance it appears our council tax is excessively high in comparison with others.</p>
<p>It then dawned on me that they had compared it with band D housing and I thought, not many people actually have houses in band D. I looked at the figures and they confirmed it, 72% of people in Hyndburn live in band A and B properties, while 7% live in band D. Therefore you cannot compare expensive band D council tax with the average wage, because the average wage is low as the majority of people live in band A and B properties.</p>
<p>It is quite wrong to use the &#8216;most expensive council&#8217; phrase as it completely misrepresents reality. I do believe it&#8217;s wrong to try and take the electorate for a ride simply because politicians know they won&#8217;t look any further than the headlines.</p>
<p>Whether the Labour group put it in the leaflets on purpose, or whether they simply don&#8217;t understand the figures, I suppose we&#8217;ll never know. Whichever one is the case I think it can only be a good thing that the Conservatives increased their majority on the council, because I don&#8217;t want a council that A) Misleads the citizens or B) have no idea what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewbarrett.org.uk/2008/05/04/hyndburn-council-tax-most-expensive-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

